CFHE Working Paper: Free Higher Ed

Making All Public Higher Education Free
By Bob Samuels
President, University of California-American Federation of Teachers
Lecturer, University of California at Los Angeles

To download this paper, please click here.

Posted on by admin in CFHE Working Papers

11 Responses to CFHE Working Paper: Free Higher Ed

  1. Alice Sunshine

    Great idea, Bob. By the way, do these comments display?

  2. Jacob Werblow

    Bob,
    This is very inspiring work.
    Very common sense. You make the case for how close we currently come to funding the amount that would be required to make public higher education free. It might be useful to touch on the military spending budget, which far exceeds the cost to make it free as well…

  3. Susan Meisenhelder

    Good point on the military spending. It would also be instructive to follow the money on this issue in another way–how much in profits have edu-businesses made because students don’t access to the well-funded, reasonably-priced colleges?

  4. Tom

    I agree with the idea of looking at wasteful military spending.

    This paper also makes me think about how really dysfunctional the current financial aid system is and what might happen if it was reorganized in a more rational way. . . . For instance, what if much of the money now granted to students so that they can pay the high tuitions of private career college instead was use fund compehensive and sound career education programs at our public comminity colleges? I’d also like to see us think about some kind of social value budgeting in higher education, a system where institutions educating the most underprepared and less well-off students are funded via an enriched formula compared to institutions that educate the elite.

  5. Lillian Taiz

    What a thought. We already spend the money; do it more efficiently and effectively and end up with free public higher ed. I like the idea of following the money that moves into the for profits who syphon off public dollars and leave our students with staggering debt.

  6. Pingback: Serfin’ USA « Badtux the Snarky Penguin

  7. Shawn Warren

    Free HE for all is not only a laudable goal, it is required by various human rights documents ratified by the US and other countries.

    However, I do not see how this reasoning (math) can possibly achieve it because it ignores the fact the the total cost of the current institutional model for HE is 2 to 4 times the total of tuition, room and board. If you want a better idea of the total cost of the institutional model (universities and colleges) look to the tuition charged by private institutions.

    If the CFHE and Samuels are interested in making HE free then alternative models for the provision of HE are required, models that reduce the more accurate total cost of HE which includes all public appropriations (e.g., those for operations and capital expansion).

    I am developing two such model. I invite the CFHE and Samuels to examine them (see website link above, particularly, “A New Tender for the Higher Education Social Contract.”). These are entrepreneurial models that do not reply on expensive institutional employers/service providers which cannot be sustained and certainly cannot be supported by the numbers provided in this working paper.

  8. Pingback: Do the Math: Free Public Higher Education Should be Considered – Huffington Post | rss

  9. Pingback: Do the Math: Free Public Higher Education Should be Considered | General Education Guide

  10. Pingback: Do the Math: Free Public Higher Education Should be Considered « Spot On Paper

  11. Pingback: Do the Math: Free Public Higher Education Should be Considered « Spot On Paper

Add a Comment